Alaska Administrative Code (Last Updated: January 12, 2017) |
Title 3. Commerce, Community, and Economic Development. |
Part 3.1. Banking, Securities, Small Loans and Corporations. |
Chapter 3.100. Procurement. |
Article 3.100.4. Competitive Sealed Proposals. |
Section 3.100.370. Evaluation of proposals.
Latest version.
-
(a) The authority will evaluate proposals based on the evaluation criteria and processes identified in the request for proposals. The authority will not use other factors, criteria, or processes. (b) A procurement evaluation committee consisting of at least three authority employees, shall evaluate proposals. Other authority employees, public officials, experts, or representatives of participating organizations may be added as appropriate if there is no conflict of interest and the procurement evaluation committee is made up of at least three employees of the authority. (c) If a procurement evaluation committee evaluates the proposals, each member shall exercise independent judgment, and the vote of one member may not be weighted more than the vote of any other member. (d) The procurement evaluation committee may hold meetings to discuss the proposals received. Evaluators may independently adjust their own scores or rankings as a result of these discussions. (e) Numerical rating systems may be used, but are not required. If a numerical rating system is used, evaluators are not required to provide additional documentation for scoring, if the relative weight of the criteria and system is defined in the solicitation. (f) If a numerical rating system is not used, each evaluator shall provide a brief narrative consistent with the evaluation criteria documenting the basis for the evaluator's ranking in writing. (g) The procurement officer shall document the evaluation process and provide a summary of the final ranking of proposals for the procurement file.
Authorities
36.30.015;44.88.080
Notes
Authority
AS 36.30.015 AS 44.88.080History
Eff. 9/25/2013, Register 207; am 2/27/2016, Register 217